{"id":845,"date":"2014-09-25T20:48:26","date_gmt":"2014-09-25T20:48:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/engineeringdiplomacy.org\/blog\/?p=845"},"modified":"2015-01-07T17:52:05","modified_gmt":"2015-01-07T17:52:05","slug":"technology-transfer-for-climate-adaptation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/engineeringdiplomacy.org\/blog\/2014\/09\/technology-transfer-for-climate-adaptation\/","title":{"rendered":"Technology Transfer for Climate Adaptation"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"<\/a>

The types of technology transfer varied between the programs, ranging from technological devices to improve irrigation or monitoring to knowledge transfer programs, such as a program to demonstrate and promote drought resistant livestock and crops. \u00a0Here, children exhibit goats their family obtained through the CwDCC program. (UNDP ALM Report, 2012) <\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

As the international community gears up for the climate negotiations in Lima<\/a> this December, technology transfer features prominently on the agenda.\u00a0 Technology transfer is essential for both mitigation and adaptation, and technologies, while not themselves a solution to climate related challenges, will play an important role in climate change mitigation and adaptation. At the same time, technology transfer is highly contentious in the negotiations, highlighting many of the historical North-South divisions that have plagued the negotiations.<\/p>\n

Stepping back from the politically-charged rhetoric of the negotiations, we recently published a paper in Nature Climate Change <\/i>titled \u201cTechnology Transfer for Adaptation\u201d<\/a>. \u00a0In it, we looked at technologies being transferred through the Global Environment Facility\u2019s (GEF) adaptation funds.\u00a0 Through both a content analysis of project proposals and case studies of three projects funded by the GEF, we analyzed trends in terms of the way technology is conceptualized and incorporated into the projects, and barriers for technology transfer and adoption from the perspective of different stakeholders.<\/p>\n

Historically, ‘technology transfer’ has been used to connote \u00a0‘North-South transfer’ or transfer of ‘hard technologies.’ However, knowledge transfer and capacity building are an important component of technology transfer, and the use of technology in addressing climate adaptation needs to incorporate tacit knowledge, behavior changes, \u00a0and broad consideration of the types of technology that may be useful for adaptation in a specific location.<\/p>\n

The 66 projects included in our analysis span the globe, with the largest portion in Africa. The case studies, from Colombia (agriculture, water supply), Peru (water supply), and Ethiopia (agriculture) varied in design and scope. Our paper discusses technology selection, market factories and technology diffusion in these three projects.<\/p>\n

\"Technology<\/a>

Technology Transfer and Adoption for Climate Change Adaptation
Many factors are important for technology selection, transfer and adoption by users. Researchers used this model as a framework for analyzing “which types of technology are being transferred for adaptation and where these transfers fit into the innovation process.”
(from Biagini et al 2014)<\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

We found that significantly more technology transfer is occurring through adaptation projects than the pessimistic rhetoric might suggest, although the scale of these projects is quite small.\u00a0 Projects tended to focus on demonstration and early deployment\/niche formation activities.<\/p>\n

Scidev.net recently published a news piece summarizing and discussing the study<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

As the international community gears up for the climate negotiations in Lima this December, technology transfer features prominently on the agenda. Technology transfer is essential for both mitigation and adaptation, and technologies, while not themselves a solution to climate related challenges, will play an important role in climate change mitigation and adaptation…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":887,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[22,23,24,30,35,55,70,73],"class_list":["post-845","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-highlights","tag-climate-change-adaptation","tag-columbia","tag-development","tag-ethiopia","tag-gef","tag-peru","tag-technology-transfer","tag-undp"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/engineeringdiplomacy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/845","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/engineeringdiplomacy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/engineeringdiplomacy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/engineeringdiplomacy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/engineeringdiplomacy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=845"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/engineeringdiplomacy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/845\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1076,"href":"https:\/\/engineeringdiplomacy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/845\/revisions\/1076"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/engineeringdiplomacy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/887"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/engineeringdiplomacy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=845"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/engineeringdiplomacy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=845"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/engineeringdiplomacy.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=845"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}