]> 2026-09-28T22:58:34+02:00 Forming A Groundwater Sustainability Agency for Salinas Valley 0 en 9770 36.674533,-121.6516531 Groundwater Supply Water Quantity Water Quality Ecosystems Governance Assets 0.434 Local Government Non-legislative governmental agency Environmental interest Industry/Corporate Interest Community or organized citizens SGMA groundwater GSA groundwater sustainability agency SGMA groundwater GSA groundwater sustainability agency|SGMA groundwater GSA groundwater sustainability agency Agriculture or Irrigation Domestic/Urban Supply 2017-11-13T19:00:54Z 2458071.2922917 Forming A Groundwater Sustainability Agency for Salinas Valley 0 1 template 3 [[ASI:+]] [[Case Study::Forming A Groundwater Sustainability Agency for Salinas Valley]] Forming A Groundwater Sustainability Agency for Salinas Valley# QUERY64f0190e7f6d00699861afdfeeeb472b 0 [8,"smw-constraint-error-allows-value-list","Semi-arid\/steppe (K\u00f6ppen B-type); Arid\/desert (K\u00f6ppen B-type)","Moist tropical (K\u00f6ppen A-type), Semi-arid\/steppe (K\u00f6ppen B-type), Arid\/desert (K\u00f6ppen B-type), Humid mid-latitude (K\u00f6ppen C-type), Continental (K\u00f6ppen D-type), Moist, Monsoon, Dry-summer, Dry-winter, cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar), ...","Climate"] Forming A Groundwater Sustainability Agency for Salinas Valley# ERR96ebd2bde492267ceaf5b922f2b54598 0 [8,"smw-constraint-error-allows-value-list","agricultural- cropland and pasture, urban","agricultural- cropland and pasture, agricultural- confined livestock operations, conservation lands, industrial use, mining operations, forest land, rangeland, urban, urban- high density, religious\/cultural sites","Land Use"] Forming A Groundwater Sustainability Agency for Salinas Valley# ERR76ccac00b166651c0532c92a2995719b 0 '''Key Tools and Frameworks'''<br /> The key tools that were essential to success in this process were the stakeholder issue assessment, stakeholder identification, collaborative problem solving, interest-based negotiation, professional mediation, and transparency. The stakeholder issue assessment was critical for defining the issues and concerns, identifying stakeholders to represent the key interests, and designing a process that was responsive to political dynamics and the task at hand. The impartial mediation and facilitation team was able to make recommendations on the process for going forward. For example, during the assessment, mediators observed that the region had a high degree of distrust and was hesitant about issues of representation so the facilitation team recommended the large, open groundwater stakeholder forum as a tool to vet and recommend the proposals that would ultimately move forward. Identifying stakeholders to participate in the process was also a critical tool or element of the process. Low trust and collaborative capacity among stakeholders emerged during the stakeholder assessment. The mediation team worked with interest groups to identify representatives that would have credibility to represent each interest in the smaller collaborative work group. The mediators met with representatives of agriculture to clarify different segments, such as berry growers and processors in addition to other agricultural interests. And, the mediators met several times with environmental organizations to help them understand the law and the negotiate representation. In addition, the mediators networked with different nongovernmental organizations and agencies to identify rural residential well owners and disadvantaged community representatives who might participate in the collaborative work group. Collaborative problem solving framework including interest-based negotiation were critical to this process. The process design focused on educating participants about the law and its requirements, and stakeholders informing one another about their interests. Understanding each other's’ interests was necessary so participants could craft solutions that were responsive to the range of interests engaged in the process. The participants used interest-based negotiation to identify and evaluate solutions. Lastly, professional mediators played an instrumental role in bringing stakeholders together and assisting with negotiations. The mediators created a process structure in which the parties were able to engage productively and negotiate outcomes that considered all the perspectives being shared. The mediators also worked to engage the broader public along the way, scheduling groundwater stakeholder forum meetings for the public and preparing communication materials on the web site and for work group members to share with constituents. Transparency was another important element of success. The communication tools helped to engage the broader community, raising awareness and creating widespread support. All meetings were open to the public. The project had a web site (www.salinasgroundwater.org, now www.svbgsa.com) that was updated regularly with all materials and process information. Forming A Groundwater Sustainability Agency for Salinas Valley# 1118d2d7d2ee8e0667a404cefbeba892 Case Study 102 en Case Study